InFact turns a claim into focused questions, retrieves and ranks evidence from the supplied static AVeriTeC knowledge base, and returns a categorical verdict with supporting evidence.
01 / Abstract
Abstract
InFact decomposes text-claim verification into six stages and retrieves evidence from the supplied static AVeriTeC knowledge base. With GPT-4o as its backbone, it achieves an AVeriTeC score of 63% on the 2024 shared task’s test set, outperforming the other 20 participating teams. Its qualitative analysis identifies cases where the retrieved evidence supports a different conclusion from the benchmark annotation.
02 / Contributions
Contributions
01
Challenge-winning baseline
Ranks first among 21 systems in the 2024 AVeriTeC shared task with a 63% test-set score.
02
Six-stage evidence retrieval and reasoning
Turns claim verification into six explicit stages, including evidence retrieval from the static AVeriTeC knowledge base.
03
Analysis of disputed annotations
Examines cases where the retrieved evidence supports a different conclusion from the benchmark annotation.
03 / Citation
Citation
Rothermel, M., Braun, T., Rohrbach, M., & Rohrbach, A. (2024). InFact: A Strong Baseline for Automated Fact-Checking. Proceedings of the Seventh Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER), 108–112.
BibTeX+
@inproceedings{rothermel2024infact,
title = {{InFact}: A Strong Baseline for Automated Fact-Checking},
author = {Mark Rothermel and Tobias Braun and Marcus Rohrbach and Anna Rohrbach},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventh Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER)},
pages = {108--112},
address = {Miami, Florida, USA},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2024.fever-1.12},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2024.fever-1.12/}
}