InFact: A Strong Baseline for Automated Fact-Checking

A six-stage, retrieval-grounded fact-checker that won the 2024 AVeriTeC shared task and set a strong text-only baseline.

Retrieval-grounded verification
InFact turns a claim into focused questions, retrieves and ranks web evidence, then reasons toward a traceable fact-checking verdict.

01 / Key message

Break a claim into an explicit investigation: retrieve current web evidence, judge it in context, and make the final verdict traceable.

02 / Method

How it works

01

Structure the claim

Interpret the claim and generate focused questions that turn verification into a tractable investigation.

02

Search the web

Retrieve and organize external evidence that directly addresses the generated questions.

03

Resolve the verdict

Reason over the gathered evidence and return a supported, refuted, or insufficient-evidence conclusion.

03 / Abstract

Abstract

The spread of disinformation creates a need for robust and scalable automated fact-checking systems. InFact is an LLM-based approach for the AVeriTeC Shared Task Challenge 2024 that decomposes text-claim verification into a six-stage process including evidence retrieval. With GPT-4o as its backbone, InFact achieves an AVeriTeC score of 63% on the test set, outperforming the other 20 participating teams and establishing a strong baseline for text-only automated fact-checking. Its qualitative analysis also identifies cases where the system's conclusion is more accurate than the benchmark's human-annotated ground truth.

04 / Contributions

What this adds

  1. 01

    Challenge-winning baseline

    Ranks first among 21 systems in the 2024 AVeriTeC shared task with a 63% test-set score.

  2. 02

    Evidence-first workflow

    Turns claim verification into six explicit stages, including live evidence retrieval rather than memory-only prediction.

  3. 03

    Ground-truth diagnosis

    Uses qualitative error analysis to expose benchmark cases where the automated conclusion may be better supported than the label.

05 / Citation

Citation

Rothermel, M., Braun, T., Rohrbach, M., & Rohrbach, A. (2024). InFact: A Strong Baseline for Automated Fact-Checking. Proceedings of the Seventh Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER), 108–112.

BibTeX
@inproceedings{rothermel2024infact,
  title     = {{InFact}: A Strong Baseline for Automated Fact-Checking},
  author    = {Mark Rothermel and Tobias Braun and Marcus Rohrbach and Anna Rohrbach},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventh Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER)},
  pages     = {108--112},
  address   = {Miami, Florida, USA},
  publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
  year      = {2024},
  doi       = {10.18653/v1/2024.fever-1.12},
  url       = {https://aclanthology.org/2024.fever-1.12/}
}